Markets 
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The judge overseeing the cases against the men accused of gang-raping LSU student Madison Brooks before her death has a son of her own who is a convicted sexual predator, records show.
One of the men accused of raping Brooks before her death is set to stand trial on Aug. 17, when 21-year-old Desmond Carter faces a jury, with Judge Gail Ray presiding over the case. Carter is the first of three suspects in Brooks’ alleged attack to stand trial.
Brooks, a 19-year-old LSU student at the time, was allegedly gang-raped after a night out in 2023, then struck and killed by a car.
Court records reviewed by Fox News Digital show that the judge’s son, 46-year-old Nelson Taylor, was convicted of several counts of forcible rape in 1997. Taylor is currently trying to get those convictions overturned, creating a debacle between the district attorney’s office and the 19th Judicial District Court, as his mother is a sitting judge.
JUDGE ALLOWS MADISON BROOKS SUPPORTERS TO WEAR PINK DESPITE DEFENSE OBJECTIONS BEFORE RAPE TRIAL
Taylor admitted to raping several girls who went to high school with him between October 1995 and April 1996.
All judges within the 19th Judicial District Court recused themselves from the case in December 2025. Taylor’s attorney filed a motion to have the convictions overturned in a November 2025 motion. While the motion was filed in November, the conflicts of interest prevented it from being heard by a judge until late July.
District Attorney Hillar Moore, who’s prosecuting the men accused of raping Brooks, filed a motion to recuse Ray from presiding over the state’s case against Casen Carver, whose trial is set to begin in November. Carver is charged with video voyeurism, first-degree rape and third-degree rape.
WATCH: Madison Brooks case: Nancy Grace previews exclusive new Fox Nation special, ‘Left for Dead’
Moore’s office filed the motion to recuse Ray from Carver’s case in November 2025, arguing she couldn’t judge fairly after the suspect waived his right to a jury trial, making her the sole decider of the case.
FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X
Prosecutors pointed to Ray’s previous exposure to evidence about Brooks’ alleged sexual history, which is being excluded from the trial, and previous rulings that went against them. Those included her order for the state to turn over data from Brooks’ cellphone, her initial ruling that evidence of Brooks’ activities in the 72 hours before the alleged rape would be admissible, and her decision ordering the state to produce items from Carver’s phone.
SIGN UP TO GET THE LATEST TRUE CRIME NEWS
However, the prosecutor’s central argument for Ray’s recusal was a series of text messages between Carver and his father, where the rape suspect claimed “we are friends with” Ray, adding that “she knows to help us,” given the judge’s son is a convicted rapist.
LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE
In another text message, Carver told his father that “judge is on our side” and was “going to rule in our favor.”
SEND US A TIP
“These are not the ‘musings’ of a teenager who was hoping for the best outcome in his case. These are affirmative statements that show that Mr. Carver believed that the judge ‘knew to help him’ because of an alleged friendship with him or someone he knew and the judge’s son’s interactions with the criminal justice system,” 19th Judicial District Judge Bradley Myers wrote in his ruling.
GOT A TIP?
The unusual combination of evidence, combined with Ray’s previous rulings and her son’s criminal history, is what prompted prosecutors to seek the recusal.
LISTEN TO THE NEW ‘CRIME & JUSTICE WITH DONNA ROTUNNO’ PODCAST
Ray was initially recused from the case in November 2025, but the Louisiana Supreme Court would later allow her to preside over Carver’s case.
GET BREAKING NEWS BY EMAIL
Former Louisiana prosecutor Franz Borghardt explained to Fox News Digital why the text messages weren’t enough to get a recusal.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“So the standard in Louisiana for recusal is, does the judge have a bias or a personal interest such that they can’t be fair and impartial to both sides?” Borghardt said. “And while those text messages on their face certainly present that, if someone says, ‘hey, this judge is a friend,’ doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re gonna be fair or impartial. And in fact, oftentimes judges that are friends will rule against you just as quickly as judges that dislike you.”
Fox News Digital reached out to Ray’s office and Taylor’s attorney for comment.
Read the full article here
