Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers withdraw request for civilian clothes, accuse prosecutors of creating a ‘spectacle’

Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers say prosecutors are trying to turn his next courtroom appearance into a spectacle.

The convicted former Lowcountry lawyer had asked to appear unshackled and in civilian clothes at trial and in televised pretrial hearings as he awaits a new murder trial in the killings of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul.

But after prosecutors accused him of seeking special treatment, Murdaugh’s defense team withdrew the request, saying they would not waste court time arguing over “the optics” of a status conference.

“If the State wants to use that for a public spectacle, so be it,” the defense wrote. “Mr. Murdaugh will not waste the Court’s time at the upcoming status conference arguing about the optics.”

“Mr. Murdaugh will not waste the Court’s time at the upcoming status conference arguing about the optics.”

MURDAUGH DEFENSE FIGHTS OVER DEATH PENALTY, VENUE CHANGE AND EVIDENCE – WHAT COULD CHANGE IN SECOND TRIAL

South Carolina prosecutors had urged a Colleton County judge to deny the motion, arguing that Murdaugh’s fame does not entitle him to be treated differently from other inmates.

FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X

Murdaugh remains in state custody on financial-crime convictions and is serving a 27-year sentence, prosecutors said. He is also serving a concurrent 40-year federal sentence tied to similar crimes.

BECKY HILL’S ‘DISGRACEFUL’ COMMENTS AND BOOK AMBITIONS UNRAVELED ALEX MURDAUGH’S MURDER CONVICTION: DOCS

His murder convictions were reversed in May by the South Carolina Supreme Court, which ordered new proceedings after finding improper interference  by the former Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca “Becky” Hill.

SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER

But the state said the reversal does not change Murdaugh’s status as an inmate or the security concerns surrounding him.

“SCDC’s practice and position here is that any inmate should remain in restraints and in uniform for court appearances,” prosecutors wrote, adding that Murdaugh’s long sentence, the seriousness of the murder charges and his notoriety all heighten security concerns.

SEND US A TIP HERE

The state also pointed to past custody issues, alleging that during the original trial, a family member passed Murdaugh a book through a defense staffer without law enforcement’s knowledge.

LISTEN TO THE NEW ‘CRIME & JUSTICE WITH DONNA ROTUNNO’ PODCAST

Prosecutors said the book was later found in his cell and led to a jail contraband warrant. They also cited two prison disciplinary actions from August 2023, including abuse of privileges and unauthorized use of another inmate’s PIN.

WHAT TYLER ROBINSON’S DEFENSE WANTS HIDDEN AND WHY PROSECUTORS AND MEDIA SAY NO IN COURT

“This case is ultimately about the fact that Defendant thinks he is special. He is not,” prosecutors wrote.

LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? FIND MORE ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB

Murdaugh’s lawyers fired back, accusing prosecutors of “histrionics” and arguing that the state had failed to show any special need to display him in shackles before potential jurors.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

They said Murdaugh has never threatened or attempted escape or violence while in custody and has appeared at numerous hearings and through a six-week trial without disruptive behavior.

The defense also argued that courts recognize the danger of showing defendants in restraints, even outside a jury’s physical presence, when cameras could broadcast the image to future jurors.

To make the point, Murdaugh’s lawyers cited the case against Tyler Robinson, the alleged assassin of Charlie Kirk, saying the judge there ordered cameras repositioned after reports Robinson had been shown in shackles and warned they could be excluded if it happened again.

The defense accused prosecutors of relying on rhetoric rather than law, writing that the case is not about whether Murdaugh “thinks” he is special, but whether the state can prove the murder charges against him.

Still, Murdaugh’s lawyers withdrew the motion, saying they did not want to distract from more substantive issues ahead of retrial, including motions involving unknown DNA from the crime scene, access to case materials and a possible venue change.

Fox News Digital has reached out to the prosecutor’s office as well as Murdaugh’s defense team.