Markets 
She booked the appointment to talk about contraception. Nineteen years old, she had recently moved to the coast to start university, and was trying hard to cope. But as the consultation unfolded, it became clear the pill was only part of the story. Her periods were so heavy and painful she was missing classes. She was distressed by worsening acne. She was in a new relationship and needed a sexually transmitted infection (STI) screen. What began as a “simple” contraceptive consultation became a complex conversation about possible endometriosis, skin care, screening and the difficult transition into adulthood.
This is why many GPs are deeply concerned about the impending rollout of pharmacy prescribing of the oral contraceptive pill in NSW.
The debate is easy to frame as a turf war between doctors and pharmacists – two professions resisting change and protecting territory. But for many in primary care, that framing misses the point entirely.
Women absolutely deserve more accessible and affordable healthcare. General practice is under enormous pressure, and many women delay care because attending a medical appointment feels financially or logistically impossible. Anyone working in women’s health sees this every day.
What concerns many GPs is the growing assumption that contraceptive care is straightforward, low-risk and transactional. Those of us who work extensively in women’s healthcare know this is rarely true.
A contraceptive consultation is often not primarily about contraception at all. It may become the best opportunity a woman has to disclose disordered eating, childhood trauma or low mood. Sometimes it is the first time a young woman has spoken openly about sex or relationships with a healthcare professional.
These conversations rely on more than protocols or prescribing algorithms. They rely on continuity, trust and therapeutic relationships. Many serious issues are identified not because somebody followed a checklist, but because an experienced clinician had the time and context to ask the right questions.
Choosing contraception safely also requires understanding medical comorbidities, medications, mental health and reproductive goals. Women’s healthcare is never a “one size fits all” approach. Even for an individual woman, what is appropriate at 19 may not be appropriate postpartum or during perimenopause.
The rhetoric of “GPs versus pharmacists” obscures the reality that many frontline pharmacists are also working under enormous strain – staff shortages, intense workloads, commercial pressures and rising patient expectations. As the president of Professional Pharmacists Australia, Leon Yap, has stated; “scope of practice expansion without dedicated support is neither sustainable nor safe for pharmacists or patients.”
Many pharmacists are deeply apprehensive about the responsibility attached to expanded prescribing roles, particularly in retail environments with limited privacy and increasing time pressure. Many women seeking contraceptive care will understandably prefer female clinicians, meaning female pharmacists are likely to absorb much of this additional emotional and clinical labour, with minimal financial compensation.
The problem is not individual pharmacists. Nor is it individual GPs. The problem is a healthcare system increasingly trying to solve structural underinvestment through fragmentation and substitution rather than collaboration.
There is also an important distinction between frontline pharmacists working within their communities and large corporate pharmacy interests driving aggressive scope expansion. Many pharmacists are simply trying to provide safe care under difficult conditions. Corporate pharmacy organisations, however, may be conflicted and have commercial incentives to increase customer foot traffic and expand healthcare delivery within retail settings. Those motivations are not always aligned with what produces the safest or most connected patient care.
This debate need not become adversarial. If GPs, pharmacists, nurses and policymakers are genuinely brought to the table together, there are countless collaborative solutions we could build. The opportunity in front of us is to invest in genuinely integrated multidisciplinary care, where pharmacists, GPs and nurses work collaboratively around patients rather than in fragmented silos. The best healthcare is delivered by trusted teams working within systems that prioritise continuity, communication and safety.
Women deserve accessible healthcare. But they also deserve healthcare that is connected, comprehensive and safe. Increased access cannot come at the expense of quality. The answer to Australia’s primary care crisis will not be found in asking overstretched professions to compete against one another. It lies in respecting each other’s expertise and rebuilding the system together.
Hayley Glasson is a GP, based in Bulli, NSW.
Make the most of your health, relationships, fitness and nutrition with our Live Well newsletter. Get it in your inbox every Monday.
From our partners
Read the full article here
